not logged in

European Urology

European Urology

Volume 62, issue 2, pages e31-e48, August 2012

Surgery in Motion

Neurovascular Structure-adjacent Frozen-section Examination (NeuroSAFE) Increases Nerve-sparing Frequency and Reduces Positive Surgical Margins in Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience After 11 069 Consecutive Patients

Thorsten Schlomm, Pierre Tennstedt, Caroline Huxhold, Thomas Steuber, Georg Salomon, Uwe Michl, Hans Heinzer, Jens Hansen, Lars Budäus, Stefan Steurer, Corinna Wittmer, Sarah Minner, Alexander Haese, Guido Sauter, Markus Graefen and Hartwig Huland

Accepted 29 April 2012, Published online 16 May 2012, pages 333 - 340


Abstract

Background

Intraoperative frozen-section analysis allows real-time histologic assessment of surgical margins (SMs) and identification of candidates for nerve-sparing (NS) procedures.

Objective

To examine the efficacy and oncologic safety of a systematic neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during NS radical prostatectomy (RP).

Design, setting, and participants

From January 2002 to June 2011, 11 069 consecutive RPs were performed at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. Of these, 5392 (49%) were conducted with NeuroSAFE.

Surgical procedure

Our NeuroSAFE approach included the whole laterorectal circumference of the prostate to determine the SM status of the complete neurovascular tissue-corresponding prostatic surface.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The impact of NeuroSAFE on NS frequency, SM status, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) was analyzed by chi-square test, and by Kaplan-Meier analyses in propensity score–based matched cohorts.

Results and limitations

Positive SMs (PSMs) were detected in 1368 (25%) NeuroSAFE RPs, leading to a secondary resection of the ipsilateral neurovascular tissue. Secondary wide resection resulted in conversion to a definitive negative SM (NSM) status in 1180 (86%) patients. In NeuroSAFE RPs, frequency of NS was significantly higher (all stages: 97% vs 81%; pT2: 99% vs 92%; pT3a: 94% vs 72%; pT3b: 88% vs 40%; p< 0.0001) and PSM rates were significantly lower (all stages: 15% vs 22%; pT2: 7% vs 12%; pT3a: 21% vs 32%; p< 0.0001) than in the matched non-NeuroSAFE RPs. In propensity score–based comparisons, NeuroSAFE had no negative impact on BCR (pT2, p= 0.06; pT3a, p= 0.17, pT3b, p= 0.99), and BCR-free survival of patients with conversion to NSM did not differ significantly from patients with primarily NSM (pT2, p= 0.16; pT3, p= 0.26). The accuracy of our NeuroSAFE approach was 97% with a false-negative rate of 2.5%. The major limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and relatively short follow-up.

Conclusions

NeuroSAFE enables real-time histologic monitoring of the oncologic safety of a NS procedure. Systematic NeuroSAFE significantly increases NS frequencies and reduces PSMs. Patients with a NeuroSAFE-detected PSM could be converted to a prognostically more favorable NSM status by secondary wide resection.

Take Home Message

We show that systematic frozen-section navigated nerve sparing significantly increases frequency of nerve sparing and reduces positive surgical margins (PSMs). Moreover, patients with a frozen-section-detected PSM could be converted to a prognostically more favorable negative-margin status by secondary wide resection.

Keywords: Prostate, Prostate cancer, Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, Surgery, Nerve-sparing, Frozen section, Surgical margin, Propensity score.


Recommend this article

Currently this article has a rating of 0. Please log in to recommend it.