not logged in

European Urology

European Urology

Volume 62, issue 4, pages e69-e82, October 2012

Kidney Cancer

Chronic Kidney Disease After Nephrectomy in Patients with Small Renal Masses: A Retrospective Observational Analysis eulogo1

Maxine Sun, Marco Bianchi, Jens Hansen, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Firas Abdollah, Zhe Tian, Jesse Sammon, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte and Pierre I. Karakiewicz

Accepted 23 March 2012, Published online 31 March 2012, pages 696 - 703


Abstract

Context

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health threat associated with increased cardiovascular disease and mortality.

Objective

To examine postoperative CKD in patients with small renal masses (SRMs) treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN).

Design, setting, and participants

A US National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)–Medicare-linked retrospective cohort of 4633 T1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who underwent PN or RN.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary outcome of interest was the onset of CKD stage ≥3. Secondary end points comprised acute renal failure (ARF), chronic renal insufficiency (CRI), anemia in CKD, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed.

Results and limitations

Postpropensity matching resulted in 840 RN and PN patients. In multivariable analyses, RN patients were 1.9-, 1.4-, 1.8-, and 1.8-fold more likely to have an occurrence of CKD, ARF, CRI, and anemia in CKD, respectively (all p≤ 0.004). The risk of ESRD between treatment groups failed to achieve statistical significance (p = 0.06).

Conclusions

PN is associated with more favorable postoperative renal function outcomes relative to RN in the setting of SRMs.

Take Home Message

Partial nephrectomy is associated with better renal function preservation.

Keywords: Renal function, Chronic kidney disease, Small renal masses, Nephrectomy, Nephron-sparing.


Recommend this article

Currently this article has a rating of 1. Please log in to recommend it.