European Urology

European Urology

Volume 57, issue 3, pages 363-550, March 2010

Urothelial Cancer

« Back to list Next article

The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Microarray Data: Identification of a Novel Gene Signature to Identify Bladder Cancer Progression

James W.F. Catto, Maysam F. Abbod, Peter J. Wild, Derek A. Linkens, Christian Pilarsky, Ishtiaq Rehman, Derek J. Rosario, Stefan Denzinger, Maximilian Burger, Robert Stoehr, Ruth Knuechel, Arndt Hartmann, Freddie C. Hamdy.

Accepted 27 October 2009, Published online 6 November 2009, pages 398 - 406


Abstract

Background

New methods for identifying bladder cancer (BCa) progression are required. Gene expression microarrays can reveal insights into disease biology and identify novel biomarkers. However, these experiments produce large datasets that are difficult to interpret.

Objective

To develop a novel method of microarray analysis combining two forms of artificial intelligence (AI): neurofuzzy modelling (NFM) and artificial neural networks (ANN) and validate it in a BCa cohort.

Design, setting, and participants

We used AI and statistical analyses to identify progression-related genes in a microarray dataset (n = 66 tumours, n = 2800 genes). The AI-selected genes were then investigated in a second cohort (n = 262 tumours) using immunohistochemistry.

Measurements

We compared the accuracy of AI and statistical approaches to identify tumour progression.

Results and limitations

AI identified 11 progression-associated genes (odds ratio [OR]: 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56–0.87; p = 0.0004), and these were more discriminate than genes chosen using statistical analyses (OR: 1.24; 95% CI, 0.96–1.60; p = 0.09). The expression of six AI-selected genes (LIG3, FAS, KRT18, ICAM1, DSG2, and BRCA2) was determined using commercial antibodies and successfully identified tumour progression (concordance index: 0.66; log-rank test: p = 0.01). AI-selected genes were more discriminate than pathologic criteria at determining progression (Cox multivariate analysis: p = 0.01). Limitations include the use of statistical correlation to identify 200 genes for AI analysis and that we did not compare regression identified genes with immunohistochemistry.

Conclusions

AI and statistical analyses use different techniques of inference to determine gene–phenotype associations and identify distinct prognostic gene signatures that are equally valid. We have identified a prognostic gene signature whose members reflect a variety of carcinogenic pathways that could identify progression in non–muscle-invasive BCa.

Take Home Message

Artificial intelligence can analyse microarray data to identify progression-related genes. We have identified a novel prognostic gene signature for bladder cancer that reflects a variety of carcinogenic pathways and that can be determined using immunohistochemistry.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Gene array, Bladder cancer, Prognosis.


Comment form

Add a comment

Your email address is only used for a confirmation mail and will not be used for other purposes.