European Urology

European Urology

Volume 57, issue 2, pages 179-362, February 2010

Reviews

« Back to list Next article

A Critical Analysis of the Actual Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Active Surveillance for Kidney Cancer

Roman Heuer, Inderbir S. Gill, Giorgio Guazzoni, Ziya Kirkali, Michael Marberger, Jerome P. Richie, Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette.

Accepted 13 October 2009, Published online 20 October 2009, pages 223 - 232


Abstract

Context

The incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) has increased steadily—most rapidly for small renal masses (SRMs). Paralleling the changing face of RCC in the past 2 decades, new, less invasive surgical options have been developed. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) is an established procedure for the treatment of RCC. Treatment of SRMs includes open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), thermal ablation, and active surveillance.

Objective

To present an overview of minimally invasive treatment options and data on surveillance for kidney cancer.

Evidence acquisition

Literature and meeting abstracts were searched using the terms renal cell carcinoma, minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery, thermal ablation, surveillance, and robotic surgery. The articles with the highest level of evidence were identified with the consensus of all the collaborative authors and reviewed.

Evidence synthesis

Renal insufficiency, as measured by the glomerular filtration rate, occurs more often after radical nephrectomy than partial nephrectomy (PN). OPN and LPN show comparable results in long-term oncologic outcomes. The treatment modality for SRMs should therefore be nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). In select patients, thermal ablation or active surveillance of SRMs is an alternative.

Conclusions

LRN has become the standard of care for most organ-confined tumours not amenable to NSS. Amongst NSS options, PN is the treatment of choice, yet remains underutilised in the community. Initial data during its learning curve revealed that LPN had higher urologic morbidity. However, current emerging data indicate that in experienced hands, LPN has shorter ischaemia times, a lower complication rate, and equivalent long-term oncologic and renal functional outcomes, yet with decreased patient morbidity compared to OPN. Robotic partial nephrectomy is being explored at select centres, and cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation are options for carefully selected tumours. Active surveillance is an option for selected high-risk patients. Percutaneous needle biopsy is likely to gain increasing relevance in the management of small renal tumours.

Take Home Message

Because preservation of renal function is paramount, partial nephrectomy must be considered the treatment of choice for surgical small renal masses (SRMs). At centres of excellence, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy outcomes now equal open partial nephrectomy outcomes for most patients with an SRM. Newer ablative techniques and active surveillance programs offer alternative treatment options for select high-risk patients.

Keywords: Renal cell carcinoma, Minimally invasive surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, Thermal ablation, Surveillance, Robotic surgery.


Comment form

Add a comment

Your email address is only used for a confirmation mail and will not be used for other purposes.