Journal Article Page
Jump to
European Urology
Volume 55, issue 2, pages 261-532, February 2009Surgery in Motion
Endoscopic Vaporesection of the Prostate Using the Continuous-Wave 2-μm Thulium Laser: Outcome and Demonstration of the Surgical Technique
Accepted 27 October 2008, Published online 12 November 2008, pages 368 - 375
Full Text Full-Text PDF (854 KB) Activate Visual Create Platinum Slide Series Place a comment
Abstract
Background
The potential of a new continuous-wave (CW) 70-W, 2.013-μm thulium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Tm:YAG) laser for the endoscopic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is investigated.
Objective
The simultaneous combination of vaporisation and resection of prostatic tissue in a retrograde fashion is the main characteristic of this new laser technique. We provide a DVD that shows the main steps of this procedure.
Design, setting, and participants
We retrospectively evaluated 56 nonconsecutive patients who were treated by thulium laser vaporesection of the prostate in our institution between 2005 and 2007.
Surgical procedure
Vaporesection of the prostate is performed by moving the fibre semicircumferentially from the verumontanum towards the bladder neck, thereby undermining tissue and cutting chips.
Measurements
Blood loss, postvoiding residual urine (PVRU), maximum flow rate (Qmax), and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were measured as well as prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The duration of the procedure, need for postoperative irrigation, duration of catheterisation, and hospital stay were recorded.
Results and limitations
The median procedure time was 60 min, postoperative irrigation was necessary in 19 out of 56 patients, and the median duration of catheterisation was 23 hr. At the day of discharge, the mean haemoglobin value decreased by 0.2 mg/dl (p = 0.13), the average Qmax improved from 8.1 to 19.3 ml/s (p < 0.001), and the PVRU decreased from 152 ml to 57 ml (p < 0.05). The blood transfusion rate was 3.6%, and two patients needed a recatheterisation postoperatively (3.6%). After a median follow-up of 9 mo, the IPSS improved from 19.8 at baseline to 8.6 (p < 0.001). Four patients had a repeat transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) during the learning curve, but this was not necessary in any of the later patients. One patient developed a urethral stricture, and another developed a bladder neck contracture.
Conclusions
The thulium laser seems to be a suitable tool for the endoscopic treatment of BPH.
Keywords: BPH, Laser surgery, Prostate, Vaporesection, Thulium.
Award pages
Copyright ©