European Urology

European Urology

Volume 52, issue 4, pages 939-1280, October 2007

[Editorial Comments by V. Scattoni and by B. Rocco]

« Back to list Next article

Prostate Biopsies Guided by Three-Dimensional Real-Time (4-D) Transrectal Ultrasonography on a Phantom: Comparative Study versus Two-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies

Jean-Alexandre Long, Vincent Daanen, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry, Jocelyne Troccaz, Jean-Jacques Rambeaud, Jean-Luc Descotes.

Accepted 14 November 2006, Published online 27 November 2006, pages 1097 - 1105


Abstract

Objective

This study evaluated the accuracy in localisation and distribution of real-time three-dimensional (4-D) ultrasound-guided biopsies on a prostate phantom.

Methods

A prostate phantom was created. A three-dimensional real-time ultrasound system with a 5.9 MHz probe was used, making it possible to see several reconstructed orthogonal viewing planes in real time. Fourteen operators performed biopsies first under 2-D then 4-D transurethral ultrasound (TRUS) guidance (336 biopsies). The biopsy path was modelled using segmentation in a 3-D ultrasonographic volume. Special software was used to visualise the biopsy paths in a reference prostate and assess the sampled area. A comparative study was performed to examine the accuracy of the entry points and target of the needle. Distribution was assessed by measuring the volume sampled and a redundancy ratio of the sampled prostate.

Results

A significant increase in accuracy in hitting the target zone was identified using 4-D ultrasonography as compared to 2-D. There was no increase in the sampled volume or improvement in the biopsy distribution with 4-D ultrasonography as compared to 2-D.

Conclusion

The 4-D TRUS guidance appears to show, on a synthetic model, an improvement in location accuracy and in the ability to reproduce a protocol. The biopsy distribution does not seem improved.

Take Home Message

The technology of three-dimensional real-time ultrasonography for prostate biopsies guidance was used to determine whether the ability to visualise simultaneously orthogonal planes allows a more accurate and more reproducible sampling, and whether biopsies are more evenly distributed within the prostate volume.

Keywords: Biopsy guidance, Prostate cancer, Prostate phantom, 3-D ultrasonography, TRUS.


Comment form

Add a comment

Your email address is only used for a confirmation mail and will not be used for other purposes.