European Urology

Abstract

Purpose

IGF-I serum levels have been demonstrated as being associated with prostate cancer (PCa) and can serve as a predictive factor for the risk of PCa development. However, the role of IGF-II in PCa and its importance as a predictive marker is still unclear. Our aim was to determine PSA and IGF-II serum levels in patients with PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to analyse the value of IGF-II as an additional predictive factor in the diagnostics of PCa.

Methods

112 patients who underwent surgery for BPH or PCa (no hormonal treatment, no further malignancies) were included in this study ((I) 38 PCa, PSA ≤ 15 ng/ml; (II) 34 PCa, PSA > 15 ng/ml; (III) 40 BPH). Preoperative serum levels of total PSA and total IGF-II were determined by ELFA and ELISA, respectively.

Results

PSA levels were (I) 5.7 ± 1.9 ng/ml; (II) 25.0 ± 11.5 ng/ml and (III) 4.0 ± 2.8 ng/ml. (II) was statistically associated with a high grading (2b/3; p = 0.0182), a high Gleason sum score (7–10; p = 0.0049) and a non-organ confined tumor (T3/4; p = 0.0009) compared to (I), all Chi² test. IGF-II levels were significantly higher in PCa (I + II) compared to BPH (833.8 ± 238.9 ng/ml vs. 633.3 ± 141.4 ng/ml, p < 0.0001, t-test). Both PSA and IGF-II were associated with tumor staging (p = 0.0097, p = 0.0308; t-test). No significant correlation was observed between PSA and IGF-II levels. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the combination of PSA and IGF-II improves the prediction of tumor staging in PCa (p = 0.0175 and p = 0.0459, Wald test). Additionally, the combination of PSA and IGF-II can significantly increase discrimination between BPH and PCa; each p < 0.0001, Wald test.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that IGF-II serum levels may serve as an additional parameter for (a) improved determination of tumor staging and (b) better discrimination between BPH and PCa.